Monday, April 29, 2013

On nosocomial infections: How hospitals can cause infections



The hospital, inasmuch as it is a place meant for recovery from illnesses, can be a source of disease all the same. In fact, if healthcare providers fail to adhere to principles of asepsis, patients under their care may just acquire nosocomial infections during the course of their hospital stay.


Image Source: blogs.scientificamerican.com


Nosocomial infections, also known as hospital-acquired infections (HAIs), are infections which patients contract while they are inside the hospital facility for medical treatment. As many as 1 out of 20 hospitalized patients contract nosocomial infections, thus resulting to complications that lead to unwanted protraction of hospital stay.

Nosocomial infections are most commonly found in three forms:

Catheter-related bloodstream infection. Most commonly found in intensive care units, these are infections caused by different types of bacteria that found their way into the bloodstream through peripheral and central lines.


Image Source: hpnonline.com


Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP). As opposed to “community-acquired pneumonia (CAP)” which occurs before or a short time after admission, HAP is a lung infection that occurs 48 hours or longer after admission to a healthcare facility. This type of pneumonia tends to be more serious, as the patients’ immune systems are often compromised, making it harder for them to fight back the infection.


Image  Source: healthtap.com


Surgical site infection (SSI). It is a post-surgical infection that occurs in the body part where the surgery was performed. It is usually caused by opportunistic transient flora (bacteria that colonize the host in certain areas but not cause disease) that manages to enter the surgical wounds. While some of these infections are only skin-deep, some manage to seep deeper, reaching deeper tissues such as visceral organs, bones, and even implanted material such as hip replacements.


Image Source: futurity.org

More updates related to patient safety and risk management can be found at this Daniel Bucsko Twitter page.

Monday, April 1, 2013

The faces of risks in surgical patient management



Patient safety is considered a serious public health issue worldwide. In fact, the World Health Organization shows that 1 out of 10 patients is harmed under hospital care even in developed countries. This shows that risks are inevitable, specifically during surgical procedures. Thus, the assessment of risks is crucial so that physicians can perform their duties effectively and make consensual decisions for whatever surgical procedures they perform.


Image Source: rasmussen.edu


In this light, tests are used in calculating or stratifying risks for patients undergoing surgery, especially in myocardial problems. This is summarized as follows:

1. General preoperative risk stratification

2. Preoperative risk stratification for myocardial events

3. Postoperative risk stratification

The purpose of this scoring system is to identify potential high-risk patients and focus on generating a multi-level risk-and-benefit discussion among hospital practitioners.



Image Source: commons.wikimedia.org


Risk is a term that comes in many forms, depending on the expectation and experience of varying patient groups. In understanding and identifying these risks, there are methods to utilize. In integrating these methods concurrently with proper implementation, risk management could improve significantly. As a result, medical practitioners and healthcare executives, like Dan Bucsko and Kurt Weinmeister, can perform their duties well in improving the quality of care for all patients, and risks, such as prescription error, injurious fall, improper documentation, adverse anesthesia effects, and even death, could ultimately be avoidable.



Image Source: clearrisk.com


Read more about health risk management and patient safety by accessing this Twitter page.

Thursday, February 28, 2013

"He's the captain of the ship": A surgeon's intraoperative responsibilities

When the entire pre-op sequence is said and done, the surgeon now gears up for the main event: the intraoperative phase.

 In the entire perioperative stage, it is in the intraoperative phase that the surgeon takes complete charge. The surgeon is personally responsible for the client’s welfare during the operation, and is required to be in the operating room or within close vicinity for the entire surgical procedure.


Image Source: Andysavage.net


Modern surgical procedures are often viewed as a team effort; as such, surgeons, being the head of the surgical team, can assign roles to each member of the staff. Surgeons may delegate associates or residents to perform a small portion of the operation under direct supervision. It is important to note, however, that delegation does not denote a transfer of personal liability. If the resident or surgical assistant commits a litigable error, the surgeon takes full responsibility.

The surgeon is allowed to leave the operating room so long as the reason is procedure-related. These may include review of related pathology and diagnostic imaging, and a short dialogue with the patient’s family. However, the absence should be brief, and a qualified substitute must be assigned to stay with the patient during the entire duration of the surgeon’s absence.


Image Source: CBC.ca



In some cases, surgeons must leave the operation prior to its completion due to unanticipated circumstances. If the absence is deemed to be protracted, qualified substitutes must be identified and should be present in the operating room before the surgeon leaves. Subsequently, the patient should be informed of the incident postoperatively.

If surgeons leave the operation for reasons which are deemed to be non-legitimate and unacceptable, healthcare executives such as Dan Bucsko and Kurt Weinmeister should be immediately informed to ensure patient safety and to profile a case in point in ensuing peer reviews.



As a captain takes charge of his crew to veer the ship toward reaching its destination, so must a surgeon lead the entire team—everyone from the assisting nurses to the anesthesiologist—toward surgical success and patient recovery. 


Image Source: Northcountrypublicradio.org


 
For more healthcare-related updates, follow this Dan Bucsko Twitter page.

Wednesday, January 30, 2013

REPOST: Patient satisfaction’s impact on physician livelihood

This American Medical News article discusses patient satisfaction and its effects on doctors' livelihood as well as their own sense of satisfaction, professionally speaking.

Image Source: ResilientAmbassadors.com

Leaving a patient satisfied can be critical to a physician’s job evaluation and pay. But what does patient satisfaction mean, and how can a doctor make sure it happens even as he or she makes treatment decisions that might not make a patient happy?

American Medical News has reported on what makes a patient satisfied enough to rate a physician highly — and how to balance giving the best care with what a patient might expect or demand. Patient satisfaction: When a doctor’s judgment risks a poor rating

Some doctors see an ethical conundrum in using patient satisfaction as a factor in rating their effectiveness as physicians — and as a factor in their pay. The problem comes when patients, unhappy that they’ve been denied a treatment they don’t need, take their anger out on physicians when assessing their services.

Image Source: Quality-Patient-Experience.com

Satisfaction scores seen as crucial to physician success

Price is the primary factor for consumers when they choose a product — except in health care, where personal experience reigns supreme. For that reason, consultants are advising physicians to win over patients with convenient, personalized and warm service. They recommend that physicians deliver the best, most appropriate care while giving each patient a satisfying experience.

Shift to medical home may not increase patient satisfaction

Researchers hypothesized that practices with more medical-home elements would have happier patients. But the data they gathered showed that didn’t always happen. The problem, they theorize, is that things that the make the office run more efficiently, and can help improve care, can be seen by patients as impersonal and factory-like.



Image Source: ThinkProgress.org

Physician rating website reveals formula for good reviews

What makes a patient happy? It’s not the physician’s expertise, or the perceived quality of care. It’s a short time in the waiting room and a longer time in the exam room. That’s the formula for patient satisfaction one organization came up with after it read 36,000 online reviews of physicians.

This Dan Bucsko Facebook page has more has more links to articles on the healthcare industry.

Friday, December 28, 2012

Clinical communication and patient safety



Image Credit: Booher.com

Miscommunication leads to error; the lack thereof often breeds tragic consequences. In clinical settings where lives are at stake, the breakdown in effective communication sometimes becomes the main culprit of infective incompetence and ineffectual processes. In the science of patient safety and healthcare risk management, communication has always been a key factor in cohesive, effective, and efficient healthcare delivery.

Image Credit: USF.edu

Stressing the importance of effective communication in healthcare processes, risk managers encourage physicians, nurses, and other healthcare staff to introduce and implement proper mechanisms and strategies that make communication one of the key components of improved healthcare delivery system. While traditional systems such as a norm for sense of hierarchy prevent open communication among staff at different rungs in the system, healthcare leaders involved in any clinical setting must be proactive in keeping a clear and effective flow of information within processes and procedures. Good communication means the clinicians and staff work as one body and mind when it comes to patient safety. There should be no room for errors, even from the simple acts of gathering patient information and reviewing medical data.

Image Credit: InCrowdNow.com

Effective communication has long been the focal focus of patient safety and risk management. To prevent incidences of clinical errors and malpractice, miscommunication among healthcare professionals must never occupy the center stage.

For more related topics, follow this Dan Bucsko < href="https://twitter.com/DanielBucsko">Twitter page.

Thursday, November 29, 2012

Executive Insight: “Innovating the Healthcare Model”

Amidst a time of record highs in healthcare outlays, see why one expert believes overhauling the existing healthcare business model will be necessary to drive down costs. Learn more by reading this article from Executive Insight.
 
Providers in the current healthcare model make money by increasing the volume of medical care; the more care they provide and the more expensive it is, the more money they make. However, while increasingly expensive care may mean higher profits for the providers, it also drives away patients who are struggling financially in a difficult economy.

"In pursuit of higher and higher profits, companies tend to focus on their lead customers" says Matt Eyring, managing partner at Innosight, a global strategy and innovation consulting firm. "They overshoot the need of other tiers of the market, and it leaves room for new disruptive entrants to come in with products and services that tend to be cheaper, simpler and increase access to markets."

Disruptive innovation is a new reality, re-shaping the healthcare landscape from one of high costs and inaccessibility to affordable care and easy patient access.

Where to Innovate
 
Disruptive innovation – a technology or other innovation that has the staying power to “disrupt” the existing marketplace – is a dynamic concept that can take on a multitude of meanings, depending on the industry and the individual circumstances of any given company. So where can healthcare executives start when they decide to innovate within their own organization? They should focus on these three areas, according to Eyring:

  • Location of care: Patients who receive care at a more localized location save money and time, and often receive higher quality of care. "Things that have to be done in an inpatient environment shift to an outpatient environment, and things from an outpatient environment to, potentially, clinics, and then to home. It's the movement, it's the de-centralization," says Eyring. 
  • Caregiver: Differently or less skilled caregivers can take on responsibilities traditionally assigned to highly skilled caregivers. As an example, Eyring explains that nurse anesthetists, rather than anesthesiologists, are now starting to administer anesthetics during medical procedures. Studies have shown that there is no significant difference in care, says Eyring. And since it cost more than six times as much to train an anesthesiologist, and they are paid twice as much, allowing nurse anesthetists to perform the same function lowers the cost without sacrificing quality of care, according to Eyring. 
  • Time of care: Preventative health is a key factor to saving lives-and money. Preventing or identifying and treating illness before it becomes a major health issue benefits the patient while also eliminating any financial burden associated with long-term treatment. "Many cancers are curable if you are detecting them upstream" Eyring adds.
Who is Innovating
 
Because healthcare is such an all-encompassing financial burden, healthcare executives are not the only ones looking to cut spending. Employers are rising to the challenge, and in an effort to reduce their healthcare expenditures, are incorporating disruptive innovations in the form of incentive-based healthcare services in their benefits packages. Many employer healthcare plans now include employee incentives for proactively managing their own healthcare. According to Eyring, Virgin Health Miles provides large corporations with an SaaS incentives platform that awards employees points for staying healthy, which can then be monetized. One of Virgin's most innovative incentives encourages employees to track their activity using company-issued pedometers and report their activity for points. Programs such as this, which focus on preventative care by emphasizing healthy lifestyles, are the first foot-hold in that market, says Eyring.

Tracking employee activity is just one example of companies shifting their healthcare strategy to incentivize their employees to be active participants in caring for their health. "Employers, interestingly, because of the unique pressures that they are facing, are actually leading many of these innovations," says Eyring.

Overhaul
 
Healthcare executives looking to disruptive innovation as a change agent have a lot of decisions to make. They will have to completely rethink their business strategy and build a new model from scratch to attain continued growth. "The stable business model in healthcare, leading to the kind of growth that these leaders need in the next five years really doesn't exist for most of them" Eyring states. He notes, as an example, that the threat of mail-order pharmacies could potentially disrupt the traditional pharmacy model, bringing to the market pharmacies that offer more consultative care, especially for patients with chronic illnesses. Pharmacies looking to grow and remain competitive will have to redesign their strategy to meet the changing needs of the patient.

"Whether it's an accountable care organization or bundled payments--any structure that provides incentives toward a payment system that aligns patients, providers, payers and employers around providing high quality care in the right venues, using the right business model--is going to gain traction and have an impact" Eyring concludes.

Today's healthcare model, riddled with inefficiencies and skyrocketing costs, desperately needs innovations that disrupt the status quo and lead to more affordable, more accessible, simpler healthcare.

Monday, October 29, 2012

Dan Bucsko: Upholding ethical standards among healthcare executives

Dan Bucsko Image Credit: insurancethoughtleadership.com


Healthcare executives, like other professionals, are expected to adhere to a set of ethical standards in the conduct of their profession. This latest blog entry for Dan Bucsko provides an overview of the Code of Ethics as promulgated by the American College of Healthcare Executives.

Healthcare administration, being a recognized profession altogether, is required to have its own ethical principles for its practitioners to abide to. As such, the American College of Healthcare Executives (ACHE), the largest international professional organization for healthcare executives, took the initiative to draft a Code of Ethics for its 40,000 members to incorporate in practice.


Dan Bucsko Image Credit: chuckgallagher.wordpress.com


ACHE’s Code of Ethics contains standards of ethical behavior for healthcare executives to observe in their professional relationships. In so doing, healthcare executives contribute toward achieving the fundamental objectives of the healthcare management profession such as the maintenance or enhancement of overall quality of life and creating a more efficient healthcare delivery system.

Dan Bucsko and other healthcare executives have an inherent obligation to act in manners that foster respect, confidence, and trust of the general public to healthcare professionals. Because of this accountability, they are expected to lead lives that exemplify only the highest ethical standards in words and in deeds.

Being leaders in their own rights, healthcare executives must strive to become models so that through their decisions and actions, they may reflect personal integrity that is worthy of emulation.


Dan Bucsko Image Credit: pncc.govt.nz

Dan Bucsko is board certified as a fellow with the ACHE. For more updates, follow this Twitter account.